UN is still the only body, which brings together major powers in close proximity. The
Security Council is the vital UN organ whose primary responsibility is the maintenance of international peace, stability and security in the world, but the Iraq war had undermined its authority and exposed its utter helplessness to prevent the conflict, the very objective for which it was set up. The US had gone into war on a unilateral footing without a clear consent of the Security Council. The emergence of new world order after the Cold War has created new challenges to the UNSC. The primary responsibility of the UN Security Council is to promote international peace and security. It acts on behalf of all the UN-members and according to the UN-Charter (Article 24). The Council determines "the existence of any threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression (Article 39).The Security Council is a
fifteen- member body comprising five permanent members viz., the United States, Russia, France, People's Republic of China and Great Britain and ten non-permanent members (It is interesting to note that after the defeat of Germany and Japan only three countries (the United States, erstwhile Soviet Union and Great Britain) from the World War II emerged possessing any real military and political power. However, when the United Nations organization was set up in 1945-46, China and France, both weak and shattered nations were made permanent members of the UNSC without any justification. It was ironical that the Chinese seat on the Security Council was occupied by the Republic of China (Taiwan) till 1971.). In accordance with established practice, elections are based on geographic distribution. The non-permanent members serve two years terms and half of them retire each year. The Security Council can pass resolutions deciding on pacific or military actions as suggested in the UN-Charter (Chapter VI, VII). The first aim is always to seek a peaceful solution to the problem by negotiations and talks. If these fail, economic sanctions can be implemented, which could include methods like "complete or partial interruption of economic relations, rail, sea, air, postal, telegraphic, radio, and other means of communication, and the severance of diplomatic relations" (
Article 33). Again, if these do not improve the situation in question or are not feasible, the Security Council can decide on military action like "demonstrations, blockade, and other operations by air, sea, or land forces of Members of the United Nations (Article 42)".Any member can move a resolution in the council. Nine votes are sufficient to carry a Security Council decision, but any permanent member may exercise a veto over any substantive proposal. While the veto if used judiciously and selectively in the interest of world peace can be a useful tool for the Security Council's capability to preserve international peace and security but this power has been often misused. The permanent members have the right to exercise their veto-power regarding any Security Council decisions. To date, the veto has been invoked 241 times: 4 times by China, 18 times by France, 29 times by the United Kingdom, 117 times combined by the Soviet Union and its successor state the Russian Federation and 73 times by the United States. During the Cold War it was used repeatedly: a whopping 238 times in totalOn security problems, a negative vote by one permanent member can defeat a proposal, even if it crossed the magic number of 9. This privilege of any one permanent member to incapacitate the Security Council is called the 'veto power'. World without wars remains a dream; more than 350 wars occurred since 1945. In the past 10-12 years alone, 5-6 million (mostly non-combatants) were killed. The Council invoked its mandatory powers some 60 times, imposed sanctions against 20 governments and groups, sent 40 peacekeeping operations, and authorized military actions in 10 instances.The membership of the UN that has touched 191 and it has gone up nearly four-fold since its inception, most of the late entrants being from developing countries of the third world. The Security Council remained virtually inaccessible to bulk of 191 member countries. Nearly 80 of them never got a chance to serve in the Council, while another 40 barely had one term. So much for the principle of democratic character of the Council! There is no denying that the present day international peace and security calls for a more representative Security Council. The reform process would be considered a success only if an enlarged Council enhanced the representation of the developing countries. While it is certain that leading economic powers like Germany and Japan would be natural contenders for the reworked UN Security Council, there is some difference of opinion on the proposed reconstitution plans.While Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) members would like expansion based on equitable geographical representation, Arab/Islamic bloc and East European nations have also staked their claim for representation on the Security Council. But the final consensus may emerge on proposal for an additional five permanent seats, with one each going to the developing countries of the regions of Africa, Asia and Latin America and the Caribbean. Along with casting its shadow on the Council, US conveniently avoided going through the Council for intervention. NATO's 'humanitarian' intervention in
Kosovo in 1999 was perhaps a turning point to signify a new momentum in the Council to rally behind the cause of multilateralism, to stand by the multilateral value of the Council and resist the American attempts to dictate. If present indications persist, yet another worth watching phase of some promise in the Council's history may be in the making
.Useful Links
Global Policy
Political Strategy
Accuracy
The UN veto and Iraq
Is the UN relevant, or is it US against the world? - EvC Forum
Why the UN is relevant?